WitnessStake: accept multiple stakes at input
This commit is contained in:
Hongrui Fang
parent
ae0e78976a
commit
d433ab17d6
2 changed files with 243 additions and 177 deletions
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,18 @@ Plutus Scripts for Stakes.
|
|||
module Agora.Stake.Scripts (stakePolicy, stakeValidator) where
|
||||
|
||||
import Agora.SafeMoney (GTTag)
|
||||
import Agora.Stake
|
||||
import Agora.Stake (
|
||||
PStakeDatum (PStakeDatum),
|
||||
PStakeRedeemer (
|
||||
PDepositWithdraw,
|
||||
PDestroy,
|
||||
PPermitVote,
|
||||
PRetractVotes
|
||||
),
|
||||
Stake (gtClassRef, proposalSTClass),
|
||||
StakeRedeemer (WitnessStake),
|
||||
stakeLocked,
|
||||
)
|
||||
import Agora.Utils (
|
||||
mustBePJust,
|
||||
mustFindDatum',
|
||||
|
|
@ -18,18 +29,22 @@ import Data.Tagged (Tagged (..), untag)
|
|||
import Plutarch.Api.V1 (
|
||||
AmountGuarantees (Positive),
|
||||
PCredential (PPubKeyCredential, PScriptCredential),
|
||||
PDatumHash,
|
||||
PMintingPolicy,
|
||||
PScriptPurpose (PMinting, PSpending),
|
||||
PTokenName,
|
||||
PTxInfo,
|
||||
PTxOut,
|
||||
PValidator,
|
||||
PValue,
|
||||
mintingPolicySymbol,
|
||||
mkMintingPolicy,
|
||||
)
|
||||
import Plutarch.Api.V1.AssetClass (passetClass, passetClassValueOf, pvalueOf)
|
||||
import Plutarch.Api.V1.ScriptContext (pfindTxInByTxOutRef, pisTokenSpent, ptxSignedBy, pvalueSpent)
|
||||
import Plutarch.Api.V1.ScriptContext (pfindTxInByTxOutRef, ptxSignedBy, pvalueSpent)
|
||||
import "liqwid-plutarch-extra" Plutarch.Api.V1.Value (pgeqByClass', pgeqBySymbol, psymbolValueOf)
|
||||
import Plutarch.Extra.List (pmapMaybe, pmsortBy)
|
||||
import Plutarch.Extra.Maybe (pfromDJust)
|
||||
import Plutarch.Extra.Record (mkRecordConstr, (.&), (.=))
|
||||
import Plutarch.Extra.TermCont (pguardC, pletC, pletFieldsC, pmatchC, ptryFromC)
|
||||
import Plutarch.Internal (punsafeCoerce)
|
||||
|
|
@ -208,7 +223,15 @@ stakeValidator stake =
|
|||
plam $ \datum redeemer ctx' -> unTermCont $ do
|
||||
ctx <- pletFieldsC @'["txInfo", "purpose"] ctx'
|
||||
txInfo <- pletC $ pfromData ctx.txInfo
|
||||
txInfoF <- pletFieldsC @'["mint", "inputs", "outputs", "signatories", "datums"] txInfo
|
||||
txInfoF <-
|
||||
pletFieldsC
|
||||
@'[ "mint"
|
||||
, "inputs"
|
||||
, "outputs"
|
||||
, "signatories"
|
||||
, "datums"
|
||||
]
|
||||
txInfo
|
||||
|
||||
(pfromData -> stakeRedeemer, _) <- ptryFromC redeemer
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -219,23 +242,25 @@ stakeValidator stake =
|
|||
|
||||
PSpending txOutRef <- pmatchC $ pfromData ctx.purpose
|
||||
|
||||
PJust txInInfo <- pmatchC $ pfindTxInByTxOutRef # (pfield @"_0" # txOutRef) # txInfoF.inputs
|
||||
ownAddress <- pletC $ pfield @"address" #$ pfield @"resolved" # txInInfo
|
||||
let continuingValue :: Term _ (PValue _ _)
|
||||
continuingValue = pfield @"value" #$ pfield @"resolved" # txInInfo
|
||||
PJust ((pfield @"resolved" #) -> resolved) <-
|
||||
pmatchC $
|
||||
pfindTxInByTxOutRef
|
||||
# (pfield @"_0" # txOutRef)
|
||||
# txInfoF.inputs
|
||||
resolvedF <- pletFieldsC @'["address", "value", "datumHash"] resolved
|
||||
|
||||
-- Whether the owner signs this transaction or not.
|
||||
ownerSignsTransaction <- pletC $ ptxSignedBy # txInfoF.signatories # stakeDatum.owner
|
||||
|
||||
stCurrencySymbol <- pletC $ pconstant $ mintingPolicySymbol $ mkMintingPolicy (stakePolicy stake.gtClassRef)
|
||||
stCurrencySymbol <-
|
||||
pletC $
|
||||
pconstant $
|
||||
mintingPolicySymbol $
|
||||
mkMintingPolicy (stakePolicy stake.gtClassRef)
|
||||
mintedST <- pletC $ psymbolValueOf # stCurrencySymbol # txInfoF.mint
|
||||
valueSpent <- pletC $ pvalueSpent # txInfoF.inputs
|
||||
spentST <- pletC $ psymbolValueOf # stCurrencySymbol #$ valueSpent
|
||||
|
||||
let AssetClass (propCs, propTn) = stake.proposalSTClass
|
||||
proposalSTClass = passetClass # pconstant propCs # pconstant propTn
|
||||
spentProposalST <- pletC $ passetClassValueOf # valueSpent # proposalSTClass
|
||||
|
||||
-- Is the stake currently locked?
|
||||
stakeIsLocked <- pletC $ stakeLocked # stakeDatum'
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -253,196 +278,237 @@ stakeValidator stake =
|
|||
pguardC "Owner signs this transaction" ownerSignsTransaction
|
||||
|
||||
pure $ popaque (pconstant ())
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
-- Handle redeemers that require own stake output.
|
||||
|
||||
_ -> unTermCont $ do
|
||||
-- Filter out own output with own address and PST.
|
||||
ownOutput <-
|
||||
let AssetClass (propCs, propTn) = stake.proposalSTClass
|
||||
proposalSTClass = passetClass # pconstant propCs # pconstant propTn
|
||||
spentProposalST = passetClassValueOf # valueSpent # proposalSTClass
|
||||
|
||||
proposalTokenMoved <- pletC $ spentProposalST #== 1
|
||||
|
||||
-- Filter out own outputs using own address and ST.
|
||||
ownOutputs <-
|
||||
pletC $
|
||||
mustBePJust # "Own output should be present" #$ pfind
|
||||
pfilter
|
||||
# plam
|
||||
( \input -> unTermCont $ do
|
||||
inputF <- pletFieldsC @'["address", "value"] input
|
||||
( \output -> unTermCont $ do
|
||||
outputF <- pletFieldsC @'["address", "value"] output
|
||||
|
||||
pure $
|
||||
inputF.address #== ownAddress
|
||||
#&& psymbolValueOf # stCurrencySymbol # inputF.value #== 1
|
||||
outputF.address #== resolvedF.address
|
||||
#&& psymbolValueOf # stCurrencySymbol # outputF.value #== 1
|
||||
)
|
||||
# pfromData txInfoF.outputs
|
||||
|
||||
stakeOut <-
|
||||
pletC $
|
||||
mustFindDatum' @PStakeDatum
|
||||
# (pfield @"datumHash" # ownOutput)
|
||||
# txInfoF.datums
|
||||
let witnessStake = unTermCont $ do
|
||||
pguardC "Either owner signs the transaction or propsoal token moved" $
|
||||
ownerSignsTransaction #|| proposalTokenMoved
|
||||
|
||||
ownOutputValue <-
|
||||
pletC $
|
||||
pfield @"value" # ownOutput
|
||||
|
||||
ownOutputValueUnchanged <-
|
||||
pletC $
|
||||
pdata continuingValue #== pdata ownOutputValue
|
||||
|
||||
stakeOutUnchanged <-
|
||||
pletC $
|
||||
pdata stakeOut #== pdata stakeDatum'
|
||||
|
||||
pure $
|
||||
pmatch stakeRedeemer $ \case
|
||||
PRetractVotes l -> unTermCont $ do
|
||||
pguardC
|
||||
"Owner signs this transaction"
|
||||
ownerSignsTransaction
|
||||
|
||||
pguardC "ST at inputs must be 1" $
|
||||
spentST #== 1
|
||||
|
||||
-- This puts trust into the Proposal. The Proposal must necessarily check
|
||||
-- that this is not abused.
|
||||
pguardC "Proposal ST spent" $
|
||||
spentProposalST #== 1
|
||||
|
||||
pguardC "A UTXO must exist with the correct output" $
|
||||
let expectedLocks = pfield @"locks" # l
|
||||
|
||||
expectedDatum =
|
||||
mkRecordConstr
|
||||
PStakeDatum
|
||||
( #stakedAmount .= stakeDatum.stakedAmount
|
||||
.& #owner .= stakeDatum.owner
|
||||
.& #lockedBy .= expectedLocks
|
||||
-- FIXME: refactor this with reference input, once it's supported by plutarch.
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- Our goal here is to allow multiple input stakes, and also ensure that every the input stakes has a
|
||||
-- corresponding output stake, which carries the same value and the same datum as the input stake.
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- Validation strategy I have tried/considered so far:
|
||||
-- 1. Check that the number of input stakes equals to the number of output stakes, and verify
|
||||
-- that every input stake has an output stake with the exact same value and datum hash.
|
||||
-- However this approach has a fatal vulnerability: let's say we have two totally identical stakes,
|
||||
-- a malicious user can comsume these two stakes and remove GTs from one of them.
|
||||
-- 2. Perform the same checks as the last approch does, while also checking that every output stake is
|
||||
-- valid(stakedAmount == actual value). However this requires that all the output stake datum are
|
||||
-- included in the transaction, and we have to find and go through them one by one to access the
|
||||
-- 'stakedAmount' fields, meaning that computationally this approach is *very* expensive.
|
||||
-- 3. The one implemented below. Find all the continuous input/output, sort them by 'datumHash', and
|
||||
-- ensure that the two sorted lists are equal.
|
||||
let ownInputs =
|
||||
pmapMaybe
|
||||
# plam
|
||||
( \input -> plet (pfield @"resolved" # input) $ \resolvedInput ->
|
||||
let value = pfield @"value" # resolvedInput
|
||||
in pif
|
||||
(psymbolValueOf # stCurrencySymbol # value #== 1)
|
||||
(pcon $ PJust resolvedInput)
|
||||
(pcon PNothing)
|
||||
)
|
||||
# pfromData txInfoF.inputs
|
||||
|
||||
valueCorrect = ownOutputValueUnchanged
|
||||
outputDatumCorrect = stakeOut #== expectedDatum
|
||||
in foldl1
|
||||
(#&&)
|
||||
[ ptraceIfFalse "valueCorrect" valueCorrect
|
||||
, ptraceIfFalse "datumCorrect" outputDatumCorrect
|
||||
]
|
||||
sortTxOuts :: Term _ (PBuiltinList (PAsData PTxOut) :--> PBuiltinList (PAsData PTxOut))
|
||||
sortTxOuts =
|
||||
plam
|
||||
( pmsortBy
|
||||
# plam
|
||||
( \((getDatumHash #) -> dhX)
|
||||
((getDatumHash #) -> dhY) -> dhX #< dhY
|
||||
)
|
||||
#
|
||||
)
|
||||
where
|
||||
getDatumHash :: Term _ (PAsData PTxOut :--> PDatumHash)
|
||||
getDatumHash = phoistAcyclic $ plam ((pfromDJust #) . pfromData . (pfield @"datumHash" #))
|
||||
|
||||
pure $ popaque (pconstant ())
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
PPermitVote l -> unTermCont $ do
|
||||
pguardC
|
||||
"Owner signs this transaction"
|
||||
ownerSignsTransaction
|
||||
sortedOwnInputs = sortTxOuts # ownInputs
|
||||
sortedOwnOutputs = sortTxOuts # ownOutputs
|
||||
|
||||
-- This puts trust into the Proposal. The Proposal must necessarily check
|
||||
-- that this is not abused.
|
||||
pguardC "Proposal ST spent" $
|
||||
spentProposalST #== 1
|
||||
pguardC "Every stake inputs has a corresponding unchanged output" $
|
||||
plistEquals # sortedOwnInputs # sortedOwnOutputs
|
||||
|
||||
-- Update the stake datum, but only the 'lockedBy' field.
|
||||
pure $ popaque $ pconstant ()
|
||||
|
||||
let -- We actually don't know whether the given lock is valid or not.
|
||||
-- This is checked in the proposal validator.
|
||||
newLock = pfield @"lock" # l
|
||||
-- Prepend the new lock to the existing locks.
|
||||
expectedLocks = pcons # newLock # stakeDatum.lockedBy
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
expectedDatum <-
|
||||
let onlyAcceptOneStake = unTermCont $ do
|
||||
pguardC "ST at inputs must be 1" $
|
||||
spentST #== 1
|
||||
|
||||
ownOutput <- pletC $ pfromData $ phead # ownOutputs
|
||||
|
||||
stakeOut <-
|
||||
pletC $
|
||||
mkRecordConstr
|
||||
PStakeDatum
|
||||
( #stakedAmount .= stakeDatum.stakedAmount
|
||||
.& #owner .= stakeDatum.owner
|
||||
.& #lockedBy .= pdata expectedLocks
|
||||
)
|
||||
mustFindDatum' @PStakeDatum
|
||||
# (pfield @"datumHash" # ownOutput)
|
||||
# txInfoF.datums
|
||||
|
||||
pguardC "A UTXO must exist with the correct output" $
|
||||
let correctOutputDatum = stakeOut #== expectedDatum
|
||||
valueCorrect = ownOutputValueUnchanged
|
||||
in foldl1
|
||||
(#&&)
|
||||
[ ptraceIfFalse "valueCorrect" valueCorrect
|
||||
, ptraceIfFalse "datumCorrect" correctOutputDatum
|
||||
]
|
||||
ownOutputValue <-
|
||||
pletC $
|
||||
pfield @"value" # ownOutput
|
||||
|
||||
pure $ popaque (pconstant ())
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
PWitnessStake _ -> unTermCont $ do
|
||||
pguardC "ST at inputs must be 1" $
|
||||
spentST #== 1
|
||||
ownOutputValueUnchanged <-
|
||||
pletC $
|
||||
pdata resolvedF.value #== pdata ownOutputValue
|
||||
|
||||
let AssetClass (propCs, propTn) = stake.proposalSTClass
|
||||
propAssetClass = passetClass # pconstant propCs # pconstant propTn
|
||||
proposalTokenMoved =
|
||||
pisTokenSpent
|
||||
# propAssetClass
|
||||
# txInfoF.inputs
|
||||
pure $
|
||||
pmatch stakeRedeemer $ \case
|
||||
PRetractVotes l -> unTermCont $ do
|
||||
pguardC
|
||||
"Owner signs this transaction"
|
||||
ownerSignsTransaction
|
||||
|
||||
-- In order for cosignature to be witnessed, it must be possible for a
|
||||
-- proposal to allow this transaction to happen. This puts trust into the Proposal.
|
||||
-- The Proposal must necessarily check that this is not abused.
|
||||
pguardC
|
||||
"Owner signs this transaction OR proposal token is spent"
|
||||
(ownerSignsTransaction #|| proposalTokenMoved)
|
||||
-- This puts trust into the Proposal. The Proposal must necessarily check
|
||||
-- that this is not abused.
|
||||
pguardC "Proposal ST spent" proposalTokenMoved
|
||||
|
||||
pguardC "A UTXO must exist with the correct output" $
|
||||
let correctOutputDatum = stakeOutUnchanged
|
||||
valueCorrect = ownOutputValueUnchanged
|
||||
in foldl1
|
||||
(#&&)
|
||||
[ ptraceIfFalse "valueCorrect" valueCorrect
|
||||
, ptraceIfFalse "correctOutputDatum" correctOutputDatum
|
||||
]
|
||||
pure $ popaque (pconstant ())
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
PDepositWithdraw r -> unTermCont $ do
|
||||
pguardC "ST at inputs must be 1" $
|
||||
spentST #== 1
|
||||
pguardC "Stake unlocked" $
|
||||
pnot #$ stakeIsLocked
|
||||
pguardC
|
||||
"Owner signs this transaction"
|
||||
ownerSignsTransaction
|
||||
pguardC "A UTXO must exist with the correct output" $
|
||||
unTermCont $ do
|
||||
let oldStakedAmount = pfromData $ stakeDatum.stakedAmount
|
||||
delta = pfromData $ pfield @"delta" # r
|
||||
pguardC "A UTXO must exist with the correct output" $
|
||||
let expectedLocks = pfield @"locks" # l
|
||||
|
||||
newStakedAmount <- pletC $ oldStakedAmount + delta
|
||||
expectedDatum =
|
||||
mkRecordConstr
|
||||
PStakeDatum
|
||||
( #stakedAmount .= stakeDatum.stakedAmount
|
||||
.& #owner .= stakeDatum.owner
|
||||
.& #lockedBy .= expectedLocks
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
pguardC "New staked amount shoudl be greater than or equal to 0" $
|
||||
zero #<= newStakedAmount
|
||||
valueCorrect = ownOutputValueUnchanged
|
||||
outputDatumCorrect = stakeOut #== expectedDatum
|
||||
in foldl1
|
||||
(#&&)
|
||||
[ ptraceIfFalse "valueCorrect" valueCorrect
|
||||
, ptraceIfFalse "datumCorrect" outputDatumCorrect
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
let expectedDatum =
|
||||
pure $ popaque (pconstant ())
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
PPermitVote l -> unTermCont $ do
|
||||
pguardC
|
||||
"Owner signs this transaction"
|
||||
ownerSignsTransaction
|
||||
|
||||
-- This puts trust into the Proposal. The Proposal must necessarily check
|
||||
-- that this is not abused.
|
||||
pguardC "Proposal ST spent" proposalTokenMoved
|
||||
|
||||
-- Update the stake datum, but only the 'lockedBy' field.
|
||||
|
||||
let -- We actually don't know whether the given lock is valid or not.
|
||||
-- This is checked in the proposal validator.
|
||||
newLock = pfield @"lock" # l
|
||||
-- Prepend the new lock to the existing locks.
|
||||
expectedLocks = pcons # newLock # stakeDatum.lockedBy
|
||||
|
||||
expectedDatum <-
|
||||
pletC $
|
||||
mkRecordConstr
|
||||
PStakeDatum
|
||||
( #stakedAmount .= pdata newStakedAmount
|
||||
( #stakedAmount .= stakeDatum.stakedAmount
|
||||
.& #owner .= stakeDatum.owner
|
||||
.& #lockedBy .= stakeDatum.lockedBy
|
||||
.& #lockedBy .= pdata expectedLocks
|
||||
)
|
||||
datumCorrect = stakeOut #== expectedDatum
|
||||
|
||||
let valueDelta :: Term _ (PValue _ 'Positive)
|
||||
valueDelta = pdiscreteValue' stake.gtClassRef # delta
|
||||
pguardC "A UTXO must exist with the correct output" $
|
||||
let correctOutputDatum = stakeOut #== expectedDatum
|
||||
valueCorrect = ownOutputValueUnchanged
|
||||
in foldl1
|
||||
(#&&)
|
||||
[ ptraceIfFalse "valueCorrect" valueCorrect
|
||||
, ptraceIfFalse "datumCorrect" correctOutputDatum
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
expectedValue =
|
||||
continuingValue <> valueDelta
|
||||
pure $ popaque (pconstant ())
|
||||
|
||||
valueCorrect =
|
||||
foldr1
|
||||
(#&&)
|
||||
[ pgeqByClass' (AssetClass ("", ""))
|
||||
# ownOutputValue
|
||||
# expectedValue
|
||||
, pgeqByClass' (untag stake.gtClassRef)
|
||||
# ownOutputValue
|
||||
# expectedValue
|
||||
, pgeqBySymbol
|
||||
# stCurrencySymbol
|
||||
# ownOutputValue
|
||||
# expectedValue
|
||||
]
|
||||
--
|
||||
pure $
|
||||
foldl1
|
||||
(#&&)
|
||||
[ ptraceIfFalse "valueCorrect" valueCorrect
|
||||
, ptraceIfFalse "datumCorrect" datumCorrect
|
||||
]
|
||||
--
|
||||
pure $ popaque (pconstant ())
|
||||
_ -> popaque (pconstant ())
|
||||
------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
PDepositWithdraw r -> unTermCont $ do
|
||||
pguardC "Stake unlocked" $
|
||||
pnot #$ stakeIsLocked
|
||||
pguardC
|
||||
"Owner signs this transaction"
|
||||
ownerSignsTransaction
|
||||
pguardC "A UTXO must exist with the correct output" $
|
||||
unTermCont $ do
|
||||
let oldStakedAmount = pfromData $ stakeDatum.stakedAmount
|
||||
delta = pfromData $ pfield @"delta" # r
|
||||
|
||||
newStakedAmount <- pletC $ oldStakedAmount + delta
|
||||
|
||||
pguardC "New staked amount shoudl be greater than or equal to 0" $
|
||||
zero #<= newStakedAmount
|
||||
|
||||
let expectedDatum =
|
||||
mkRecordConstr
|
||||
PStakeDatum
|
||||
( #stakedAmount .= pdata newStakedAmount
|
||||
.& #owner .= stakeDatum.owner
|
||||
.& #lockedBy .= stakeDatum.lockedBy
|
||||
)
|
||||
datumCorrect = stakeOut #== expectedDatum
|
||||
|
||||
let valueDelta :: Term _ (PValue _ 'Positive)
|
||||
valueDelta = pdiscreteValue' stake.gtClassRef # delta
|
||||
|
||||
expectedValue =
|
||||
resolvedF.value <> valueDelta
|
||||
|
||||
valueCorrect =
|
||||
foldr1
|
||||
(#&&)
|
||||
[ pgeqByClass' (AssetClass ("", ""))
|
||||
# ownOutputValue
|
||||
# expectedValue
|
||||
, pgeqByClass' (untag stake.gtClassRef)
|
||||
# ownOutputValue
|
||||
# expectedValue
|
||||
, pgeqBySymbol
|
||||
# stCurrencySymbol
|
||||
# ownOutputValue
|
||||
# expectedValue
|
||||
]
|
||||
--
|
||||
pure $
|
||||
foldl1
|
||||
(#&&)
|
||||
[ ptraceIfFalse "valueCorrect" valueCorrect
|
||||
, ptraceIfFalse "datumCorrect" datumCorrect
|
||||
]
|
||||
--
|
||||
pure $ popaque (pconstant ())
|
||||
_ -> popaque (pconstant ())
|
||||
|
||||
pure $
|
||||
pif
|
||||
(pdata stakeRedeemer #== pconstantData WitnessStake)
|
||||
witnessStake
|
||||
onlyAcceptOneStake
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,13 +5,13 @@ Agora/Effects/Treasury Withdrawal Effect/effect/Mixed Assets,456007605,1104500,3
|
|||
Agora/Effects/Governor Mutation Effect/validator/valid new governor datum/governor validator should pass,87839169,243032,8561
|
||||
Agora/Effects/Governor Mutation Effect/validator/valid new governor datum/effect validator should pass,106082031,292993,3609
|
||||
Agora/Stake/policy/stakeCreation,50939580,148729,2387
|
||||
Agora/Stake/validator/stakeDepositWithdraw deposit,181581435,493259,4413
|
||||
Agora/Stake/validator/stakeDepositWithdraw withdraw,181581435,493259,4401
|
||||
Agora/Stake/validator/stakeDepositWithdraw deposit,180222751,492217,5003
|
||||
Agora/Stake/validator/stakeDepositWithdraw withdraw,180222751,492217,4991
|
||||
Agora/Proposal/policy/proposalCreation,23140177,69194,1515
|
||||
Agora/Proposal/validator/cosignature/proposal,240482868,674626,8525
|
||||
Agora/Proposal/validator/cosignature/stake,125315872,312659,4942
|
||||
Agora/Proposal/validator/cosignature/stake,136781411,336612,5528
|
||||
Agora/Proposal/validator/voting/proposal,243946100,678901,8443
|
||||
Agora/Proposal/validator/voting/stake,120122971,320497,4899
|
||||
Agora/Proposal/validator/voting/stake,128972262,348186,5489
|
||||
Agora/Proposal/validator/advancing/successfully advance to next state/Draft -> VotringReady,219342631,620576,8350
|
||||
Agora/Proposal/validator/advancing/successfully advance to next state/VotingReady -> Locked,247748475,699343,8359
|
||||
Agora/Proposal/validator/advancing/successfully advance to next state/Locked -> Finished,236509366,666512,8359
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue