Posted updates on proposals technical design
This commit is contained in:
parent
4f03d7d848
commit
16980e9257
2 changed files with 54 additions and 55 deletions
|
|
@ -19,6 +19,12 @@
|
|||
|
||||
[Jack Hodgkinson]: https://github.com/jhodgdev
|
||||
|
||||
[Peter Dragos]: https://github.com/peter-mlabs
|
||||
|
||||
**Current status:**
|
||||
|
||||
Initially written up by [Emily Martins] for Liqwid. Transferred across to Agora. Rewritten by [Jack Hodgkinson]. Outstanding suggestions from [Peter Dragos] that require addressing.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
|
||||
## Authority tokens
|
||||
|
|
@ -66,8 +72,6 @@ It is essentially impossible for the system to prevent from conflicting effects
|
|||
|
||||
The ability to alter large swathes of the system being conferred by the ownership of a single token poses the risk of (purposeful or inadvertent) harm. There are steps one can take to lessen this risk:
|
||||
|
||||
> Jack 2022-02-02: Is there any scope for 'domain specific' GATs? Effects could be limited to altering a single component of the system and therefore be issued with GATs that only permit the altering of that component.
|
||||
|
||||
- All validators for an effect transaction are specified **in full**. In comparison to the normal writing of validators, where one only specifies what they must, one must do all they can to avoid undesired behaviour being permitted by the validator.
|
||||
- All transactions are only executed by one of a few 'trusted' DAO members. This would necessarily have to be encoded in the effect.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue