fix(dao,mcp): clamp proposal_advance validity range to fit phase window
The advance builder previously hard-coded the validity range to [tip_slot, tip_slot + VALIDITY_RANGE_SLOTS=1799]. For early Draft→VotingReady advance with the wide 1799-slot range, the upper bound shoots ~30min past starting_time — way past drafting_end on any DAO with windows narrower than 30 min, including Sulkta-shape 30-min DAOs whose drafting period happens to start partly elapsed. Validator's getTimingRelation rejects straddles and the MCP layer then errored 'tx validity range straddles drafting period boundary'. Two-part fix: 1. ProposalAdvanceArgs gains optional valid_from_slot_override + invalid_from_slot_override fields. None preserves legacy behavior; Some(...) lets the MCP layer dictate a clamped range. Builder defends against degenerate ranges (invalid_from <= valid_from). 2. MCP-side dao_proposal_advance_unsigned, when transition is DraftToVotingReady or VotingReadyToLocked and the natural [tip, tip+1799] would overshoot the period end, clamps invalid_from to the period_end slot. Refuses if remaining slots < 5 (chain has no room to include the tx) and prompts the caller to wait for the failed-too-late path instead. Caught 2026-05-08 trying to drive preprod_test2 proposal #0 through the proper Draft→VotingReady arc — chain time was ~3 min past starting_time, so 1799-slot range overshot drafting_end by ~27 min. Same code path now clamps to the remaining ~27 min of drafting period. Closes audit finding H-2 for the DraftToVotingReady and VotingReadyToLocked transitions. Cosign + vote builders also have H-2 (raw tip_slot for validity_from); those are deferred.
This commit is contained in:
parent
48679883ec
commit
892e4b0ae1
2 changed files with 80 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -2620,26 +2620,65 @@ impl WalletService {
|
|||
let locking_end = voting_end + tc.locking_time;
|
||||
let executing_end = locking_end + tc.executing_time;
|
||||
|
||||
// The validity-range overrides we'll pass to the builder. None
|
||||
// = builder uses [tip_slot, tip_slot + VALIDITY_RANGE_SLOTS] as
|
||||
// before. Some(...) lets us clamp when the natural range would
|
||||
// straddle a phase boundary — e.g. early Draft→VotingReady
|
||||
// advance with the wide 1799-slot range ends 30min past
|
||||
// starting_time, way past drafting_end on a 30-min DAO.
|
||||
let mut valid_from_slot_override: Option<u64> = None;
|
||||
let mut invalid_from_slot_override: Option<u64> = None;
|
||||
|
||||
let transition = match target.datum.status {
|
||||
PS::Draft => {
|
||||
if tx_lower_ms >= st && tx_upper_ms <= drafting_end {
|
||||
// Fully inside drafting period — happy path.
|
||||
// Already fully inside drafting period — happy path.
|
||||
AdvanceTransition::DraftToVotingReady
|
||||
} else if tx_lower_ms >= st && tx_lower_ms < drafting_end {
|
||||
// Lower is in drafting but upper overflows. Clamp
|
||||
// upper to drafting_end so the range fits — still
|
||||
// satisfies validator's PWithin check, just narrower.
|
||||
// Min 5-slot width so the chain has room to include.
|
||||
let drafting_end_slot = posix_ms_to_slot(cfg.network, drafting_end)?;
|
||||
if drafting_end_slot <= tip_slot + 5 {
|
||||
return Err(format!(
|
||||
"Draft→VotingReady early-advance: only {} slots of drafting period \
|
||||
remaining (drafting_end_slot={drafting_end_slot}, tip_slot={tip_slot}); \
|
||||
too narrow to include the tx. Wait for drafting period to fully expire \
|
||||
then re-call to take the Draft→Finished path.",
|
||||
drafting_end_slot.saturating_sub(tip_slot),
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
invalid_from_slot_override = Some(drafting_end_slot);
|
||||
AdvanceTransition::DraftToVotingReady
|
||||
} else if tx_lower_ms > drafting_end {
|
||||
// Strictly after — failed-too-late path.
|
||||
AdvanceTransition::DraftToFinished
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return Err(format!(
|
||||
"tx validity range [{tx_lower_ms}, {tx_upper_ms}] ms straddles drafting \
|
||||
period boundary [{st}, {drafting_end}]; wait ~{} ms for tx upper to clear, \
|
||||
OR refuse to advance until status is past Draft",
|
||||
drafting_end.saturating_sub(tx_lower_ms)
|
||||
"tx validity range [{tx_lower_ms}, {tx_upper_ms}] ms cannot reach a clean \
|
||||
in-drafting window [{st}, {drafting_end}] nor a strictly-past-drafting \
|
||||
window — proposal starting_time may be in the future"
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
PS::VotingReady => {
|
||||
if tx_lower_ms >= voting_end && tx_upper_ms <= locking_end {
|
||||
AdvanceTransition::VotingReadyToLocked
|
||||
} else if tx_lower_ms >= voting_end && tx_lower_ms < locking_end {
|
||||
// Clamp upper to locking_end — same trick as Draft.
|
||||
let locking_end_slot = posix_ms_to_slot(cfg.network, locking_end)?;
|
||||
if locking_end_slot <= tip_slot + 5 {
|
||||
return Err(format!(
|
||||
"VotingReady→Locked: only {} slots of locking window remaining \
|
||||
(locking_end_slot={locking_end_slot}, tip_slot={tip_slot}); \
|
||||
too narrow to include the tx. Wait then re-call to take \
|
||||
VotingReady→Finished.",
|
||||
locking_end_slot.saturating_sub(tip_slot),
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
invalid_from_slot_override = Some(locking_end_slot);
|
||||
AdvanceTransition::VotingReadyToLocked
|
||||
} else if tx_lower_ms > locking_end {
|
||||
AdvanceTransition::VotingReadyToFinished
|
||||
} else if tx_lower_ms < voting_end {
|
||||
|
|
@ -2750,6 +2789,8 @@ impl WalletService {
|
|||
wallet_utxos,
|
||||
advancer_pkh,
|
||||
tip_slot,
|
||||
valid_from_slot_override,
|
||||
invalid_from_slot_override,
|
||||
fee_lovelace,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.map_err(|e| e.to_string())?;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue